From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardin v. Latimer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 24, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1133 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1133 EFB P

09-24-2012

KEVIN HOSE HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. KAREN LATIMER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4). On August 9, 2012, the court screened plaintiff's second amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court found service appropriate as to defendant Gowan, and granted plaintiff thirty days to submit documents necessary to effect service of process on defendant. Dckt. No. 22. The order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in this action being dismissed. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not submitted the materials necessary for service or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110.

___________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hardin v. Latimer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 24, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1133 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Hardin v. Latimer

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN HOSE HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. KAREN LATIMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 24, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1133 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2012)