Hampton v. Sahota

Full title: ARMSTER HAMPTON, Plaintiff, v. P. SAHOTA, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 25, 2008

No. CIV S-06-0966 RRB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0966 RRB DAD P.

March 25, 2008

ORDER

DALE DROZD, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 10, 2007, plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. Therein, plaintiff requested a low-iodine diet. On March 18, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw his October 10, 2007 motion. Plaintiff explained that he succeeded in obtaining his special diet with the assistance of the Prison Law Office.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's March 18, 2008 motion to withdraw his October 10, 2007 motion for a preliminary injunction is granted; and

2. Plaintiff's October 10, 2007 motion for a preliminary injunction is deemed withdrawn.