From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldberg v. Sitomer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1984
472 N.E.2d 44 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued September 12, 1984

Decided October 11, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Edward J. Greenfield, J.

Lawrence M. McKenna and Harry E. Youtt for appellant.

Timothy P. Butler and Robert E. Meshel for Sitomer, Sitomer Porges, respondent.

Harold Davis for Jacob Aschkenasy, respondent.

Alan Kanzer and George Berlstein for Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company and others, respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Samuel J. Silverman at the Appellate Division ( 97 A.D.2d 114).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, SIMONS and KAYE. Judge MEYER concurs on constraint of Morrison v National Broadcasting Co. ( 19 N.Y.2d 453).


Summaries of

Goldberg v. Sitomer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1984
472 N.E.2d 44 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Goldberg v. Sitomer

Case Details

Full title:STUART C. GOLDBERG, Appellant, v. SITOMER, SITOMER PORGES et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 11, 1984

Citations

472 N.E.2d 44 (N.Y. 1984)
472 N.E.2d 44
482 N.Y.S.2d 268

Citing Cases

Wrase v. Bosco

We affirm. The plaintiff's actions were properly treated as seeking to recover damages for intentional…

Van Donsel v. Schrader

Supreme Court held defendant's motion in abeyance for further discovery as to defendant's motivations in…