From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godown v. Dippery

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2006
No. 2:05-cv-2085-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2006)

Opinion

No. 2:05-cv-2085-GEB-CMK-P.

January 26, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On December 7, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(d), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 7, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court orders and rules; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.


Summaries of

Godown v. Dippery

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2006
No. 2:05-cv-2085-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Godown v. Dippery

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ARLAN GODOWN, Plaintiff, v. JAMES DIPPERY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 26, 2006

Citations

No. 2:05-cv-2085-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2006)