From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilliam v. Frances

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Oct 5, 2015
CV 14-5716-PSG (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2015)

Opinion


CLEON W. GILLIAM, Plaintiff, v. E. FRANCES, et al., Defendants. No. CV 14-5716-PSG (PLA) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. October 5, 2015

          ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REVISED INTERIM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's revised interim report and recommendation, and the objections to the interim report and recommendation that have been filed herein. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

         ACCORDINGLY, THE COURT:

         1. Accepts the revised interim report and recommendation.

         2. Grants defendants' Motion to Dismiss;

         3. Dismisses with prejudice and without leave to amend plaintiff's:

         (a) prayer for declaratory and injunctive relief arising from any alleged federal civil rights violation;

         (b) federal civil rights claims against the CDCR;

         (c) ADA and federal civil rights claims against defendants Finander, Shank, Morris, Marquez, Martinez, and Williams, in their individual as well as official capacities; and

         (d) ADA claims against defendant Frances in her individual capacity;

         4. Dismisses plaintiff's prayer for declaratory or injunctive relief pursuant to the ADA without leave to amend but without prejudice to plaintiff pursuing such claims in the Armstrong class action;

         5. Dismisses with leave to amend plaintiff's:

         (a) Eighth Amendment claim for monetary damages against defendant Frances in her individual capacity; and

         (b) ADA claim for monetary damages against the CDCR and defendant Frances in her official capacity; and

         6. Denies as moot plaintiff's Request (see Docket No. 34) that the Court order additional defendants named in the FAC be served.

         The clerk shall serve this order on all counsel or parties of record.


Summaries of

Gilliam v. Frances

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Oct 5, 2015
CV 14-5716-PSG (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Gilliam v. Frances

Case Details

Full title:CLEON W. GILLIAM, Plaintiff, v. E. FRANCES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Oct 5, 2015

Citations

CV 14-5716-PSG (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2015)