From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gillaspy v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
Case No. 2:10-CV-02753-LKK-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-CV-02753-LKK-EFB

01-09-2012

ALEXANDER GILLASPY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; PAUL LABANE; CHRISTOPHER NELSON, Defendants.

LAW OFFICES OF JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III (SBN 118694) MANOLO H. OLASO (SBN 195629) Attorneys for Plaintiff ALEXANDER GILLASPY RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP ROBERT L. CHALFANT (SBN 203051) WENDY MOTOOKA (SBN 233589) Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO RIVERA & ASSOCIATES JESSE M. RIVERA (SBN 84529) Attorneys for Defendants Deputy Paul Labane and Deputy Christopher Nelson


LAW OFFICES OF JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III

JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III (SBN 118694)

MANOLO H. OLASO (SBN 195629)

Attorneys for Plaintiff ALEXANDER GILLASPY

RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

ROBERT L. CHALFANT (SBN 203051)

WENDY MOTOOKA (SBN 233589)

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

RIVERA & ASSOCIATES

JESSE M. RIVERA (SBN 84529)

Attorneys for Defendants Deputy Paul Labane

and Deputy Christopher Nelson

STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER BY

CONTINUING THE DEADLINES FOR COMPLETING DISCOVERY AND

COMPLETING LAW AND MOTION; ORDER

Plaintiff ALEXANDER GILLASPY and Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CHRISTOPHER NELSON, and PAUL LABANE, through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to modify the Scheduling Order in this matter, if approved by the Court, as follows:

1. The deadline for completing discovery shall be continued from February 29, 2012 to March 30, 2012.
2. The deadline for disclosing experts shall be continued to January 30, 2012 (60 days before the close of discovery).
3. The deadline for filing the mid-litigation statement shall be continued March 16, 2012 (14 days prior to the close of discovery).
4. The deadline for completing law and motion shall be continued from April 30, 2012 to May 30, 2012.

This request is based on the sudden and unexpected death of a family member of Plaintiff's attorney. Specifically, the family member passed away on December 28, 2011 and Plaintiff's counsel will therefore be out of the office and unavailable for approximately 30 days. Good cause therefore exists for so modifying the Scheduling Order.

Respectfully submitted,

_________

JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN, III

Attorneys for Plaintiff ALEXANDER GILLASPY

_________

ROBERT L. CHALFANT

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

_________

JESSE M. RIVERA

Attorneys for Defendant Paul Labane

Christopher Nelson

ORDER MODIFYING THE SCHEDULING ORDER

After considering the Stipulation by and between the parties through their counsel of record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The deadline for completing discovery shall be continued from February 29, 2012 to March 30, 2012.
2. The deadline for disclosing experts shall be continued to January 30, 2012 (60 days before the close of discovery).
3. The deadline for filing the mid-litigation statement shall be continued March 16, 2012 (14 days prior to the close of discovery).
4. The deadline for completing law and motion shall be continued from April 30, 2012 to May 30, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Gillaspy v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
Case No. 2:10-CV-02753-LKK-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Gillaspy v. Cnty. of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER GILLASPY, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; PAUL LABANE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:10-CV-02753-LKK-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)