From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garland v. Hughes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 18, 2015
Case No. CV 13-6574-FMO (KK) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-6574-FMO (KK)

09-18-2015

SHAUN DARNELL GARLAND, Plaintiff, v. CHARLIE HUGHES, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) dismissing Plaintiff's federal claims regarding his placement in administrative segregation in January 2012 and March 2012 with prejudice, (2) dismissing Plaintiff's federal claims regarding his placement in administrative segregation in August 2011 without prejudice, but without leave to amend, and (3) dismissing Plaintiff's state-law claims without prejudice, but without leave to amend. DATED: September 18, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Garland v. Hughes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 18, 2015
Case No. CV 13-6574-FMO (KK) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Garland v. Hughes

Case Details

Full title:SHAUN DARNELL GARLAND, Plaintiff, v. CHARLIE HUGHES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 18, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 13-6574-FMO (KK) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2015)