holding it was harmless error because under the facts of that case, the EEOC would not have added appreciable weight to the contention of discrimination
Summary of this case from Lopez v. KempthorneNo. 80-810.
January 19, 1981.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 618 F. 2d 264.
holding it was harmless error because under the facts of that case, the EEOC would not have added appreciable weight to the contention of discrimination
Summary of this case from Lopez v. Kempthornepointing guns at taxi to halt it did not constitute arrest
Summary of this case from United States v. O'Connorstating that the court need not decide in this case whether section 1981 "protects those who are denied these rights because they are Hispanic-Americans."
Summary of this case from Ortiz v. Bank of AmericaFull title:GARCIA v. GLOOR ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 19, 1981
Gronowicz would not be protected by a privilege, such as is afforded by typical press shield laws, merely to…
United States v. Salinas-CeronSalinas' answers to the agents' questions, if believed, obviously had the capability to influence the agents…