From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gallardo v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
No. CIV S-11-1230 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1230 WBS DAD P

01-09-2012

FRANK GALLARDO, Plaintiff, v. M. CATE, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On November 29, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or to pay the $350.00 filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

_____________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DAD:4

gall1230.fifp


Summaries of

Gallardo v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
No. CIV S-11-1230 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Gallardo v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:FRANK GALLARDO, Plaintiff, v. M. CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1230 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)