From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freidus v. Todem Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 23, 1982
434 N.E.2d 1341 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Argued February 15, 1982

Decided March 23, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN J.J. JONES, J.

John M. Armentano, Samuel S. Tripp and Edward I. Penson for appellant.

Jesse Rothman and Robert Kruger for respondent.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division so far as appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in that court's memorandum decision. We add only that the Appellate Division did not exceed its powers when its order stated that "it is determined that Todem Homes, Inc., has the right to specific performance of the option agreement dated June 10, 1969". Although not an order granting specific performance in the earlier action, we take this "determination" as a necessary predicate to deciding the question of ownership of the property in dispute.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur; Judge MEYER taking no part.

Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Freidus v. Todem Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 23, 1982
434 N.E.2d 1341 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Freidus v. Todem Homes, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ELLA FREIDUS, Appellant, v. TODEM HOMES, INC., Respondent, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 23, 1982

Citations

434 N.E.2d 1341 (N.Y. 1982)
434 N.E.2d 1341
449 N.Y.S.2d 963

Citing Cases

Merritt Hill Vineyards Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.

This court has consistently upheld the Appellate Division's authority to grant such relief pursuant to CPLR…

Gardner v. Jacon, Wiegen

His papers were therefore sufficient. Moreover, since the court, on a motion for summary judgment, is invited…