From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Folley v. Gorman

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 17, 2022
3-22-cv-16 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2022)

Opinion

3-22-cv-16

03-17-2022

DEREK FOLLEY, Plaintiff, v. BARBARA P. GORMAN, et al., Defendants.


Thomas M. Rose, District Judge

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Michael R. Merz, United States Magistrate Judge

For the reasons set forth in the prior Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 71), to wit, because this case is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 8) should be denied.

NOTICE REGARDING OBJECTIONS

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen days after being served with this Report and Recommendations. Because this document is being served by mail, three days are added under Fed.R.Civ.P. 6, but service is complete when the document is mailed, not when it is received. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. A party may respond to another party's objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. #


Summaries of

Folley v. Gorman

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 17, 2022
3-22-cv-16 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Folley v. Gorman

Case Details

Full title:DEREK FOLLEY, Plaintiff, v. BARBARA P. GORMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

3-22-cv-16 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2022)