From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Jul 13, 2012
No. 3:11-cv-3050-AC (D. Or. Jul. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-cv-3050-AC

07-13-2012

PETER JOAQUIN FLORES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation (#20) on June 12, 2012, in which he recommends that this Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying plaintiff disability benefits.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation [20]. Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision to deny plaintiff disability benefits is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Flores v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Jul 13, 2012
No. 3:11-cv-3050-AC (D. Or. Jul. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Flores v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:PETER JOAQUIN FLORES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Jul 13, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-cv-3050-AC (D. Or. Jul. 13, 2012)