From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. Cushman

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 10, 1938
99 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1938)

Opinion

November 10, 1938.

Upon petition for writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Original proceeding by Joseph Fisher against the Honorable Edward E. Cushman, District Judge of the United States District Court in and for the Western District of Washington, Southern Division, for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to set aside his order denying the petitioner leave to prosecute an appeal in forma pauperis, from an order of the District Court denying the petitioner's writ of habeas corpus, wherein the petitioner sought leave to file petition for writ of mandamus in forma pauperis.

Leave to file petition for writ of mandamus without payment of costs denied.

Joseph L. Fisher, in pro. per.

No other appearances entered.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.


Petitioner seeks permission to file a petition for writ of mandamus in forma pauperis. Such leave will not be granted unless there is some merit in the petition. 28 U.S.C.A. § 832; Boggan v. Provident Life Accident Ins. Co., 5 Cir., 79 F.2d 721; De Groot v. U.S., 9 Cir., 88 F.2d 624. Petitioner seeks a writ directing a District Judge to set aside his order denying petitioner leave to prosecute an appeal in forma pauperis from an order of the District Court denying petitioner's writ of habeas corpus. A petition for leave to prosecute an appeal in forma pauperis is granted only when there is some merit in the appeal. Boggan v. Provident Life Accident Ins. Co., supra; De Groot v. U.S., supra. This is a question to be decided by the judge to whom the application is made. The proposed petition shows that the trial judge certified that the appeal was frivolous and denied the application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Mandamus can not be used to review this action of the trial court which involves the exercise of discretion and judgment. In re Parsons, 150 U.S. 150, 14 S.Ct. 50, 37 L.Ed. 1034; Hudson v. Parker, 156 U.S. 277, 15 S.Ct. 450, 39 L.Ed. 424; In re Press Printers Publishers, 3 Cir., 12 F.2d 660. As there is no merit in the petition for writ of mandamus leave to file it without prepayment of costs is denied.


Summaries of

Fisher v. Cushman

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 10, 1938
99 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1938)
Case details for

Fisher v. Cushman

Case Details

Full title:FISHER v. CUSHMAN, District Judge

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 10, 1938

Citations

99 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1938)

Citing Cases

Landy v. Silverman

Landy's contention that the licenses here are not property is unrealistic. It was held in Fisher v. Cushman,…

Higgins v. Steele

Prince v. Klune, 80 U.S. App.D.C. 31, 148 F.2d 18; Dorsey v. Gill, 80 U.S. App.D.C. 9, 148 F.2d 857, 877. An…