From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

First National Bank of Alabama-Huntsville v. Haile

U.S.
Feb 22, 1982
455 U.S. 949 (1982)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding the process authorized by § 1692 is nationwide and the appointment court's process extends to any judicial district where receivership property is found; the minimum contacts analysis, as a limitation on state extra-territorial power, is "simply inapposite" where Congress has provided for nationwide service of process.

Summary of this case from Securities Exchange Commission v. Tanner
See 4 Summaries

Opinion

No. 81-1243.

February 22, 1982.

C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 657 F. 2d 816.

Summaries of

First National Bank of Alabama-Huntsville v. Haile

U.S.
Feb 22, 1982
455 U.S. 949 (1982)

finding the process authorized by § 1692 is nationwide and the appointment court's process extends to any judicial district where receivership property is found; the minimum contacts analysis, as a limitation on state extra-territorial power, is "simply inapposite" where Congress has provided for nationwide service of process.

Summary of this case from Securities Exchange Commission v. Tanner

rejecting similar lack of specificity challenge to RICO conspiracy indictment where indictment identified the pattern of racketeering activity as "a number of bribes that occurred between November 1975 and January 1980"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Crockett

discussing nationwide reach of federal receivers

Summary of this case from Select Creations, v. Paliafito America

distinguishing Gipson; jury need not agree unanimously as to which overt acts of defendants established conspiracy

Summary of this case from Rice v. State
Case details for

First National Bank of Alabama-Huntsville v. Haile

Case Details

Full title:FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALABAMA-HUNTSVILLE, FORMERLY HENDERSON NATIONAL…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 22, 1982

Citations

455 U.S. 949 (1982)

Citing Cases

United States v. Pepe

This proof, according to Facchiano, produced a fatal variance in violation of the rule that "a material…

U.S. v. Castro

DISCUSSION [28] I. Material Variance and Joinder Appellants contend that at best the government's proof at…

106 Citing Cases