Field v. Sisto

Full title: MARSHALL LEE FIELD, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Warden, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 10, 2010

NO. CV-06-2562-RHW-JPH (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2010)

Opinion

NO. CV-06-2562-RHW-JPH.

November 10, 2010

ORDER GRANTING MOTION REQUESTING 30 DAY EXTENSION TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ROBERT WHALEY, District Judge

Before the Court is Petitioner's Motion Requesting 30 Day Extension to File Objections to Magistrate's Report and Recommendation (Ct. Rec. 31). The motion was heard without oral argument and on an expedited basis.

Petitioner asks for a 30-day extension of time within which to file his Objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner indicates that he did not receive a copy of the Report and Recommendation until October 21, 2010. Moreover, Petitioner reports that the institution in which he is currently incarcerated is under a perpetual "modified program" where he is in lock-down status every other day, due to emergency budgetary conditions facing the State of California.

The Court finds good cause exists to grant the motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Petitioner's Motion Requesting 30 Day Extension to File Objections to Magistrate's Report and Recommendation (Ct. Rec. 31) is GRANTED.

2. On or before November 29, 2010, Petitioner shall filed his Objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and forward copies to counsel and Petitioner.

DATED this 9^th day of November, 2010.