From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernando v. Marshall

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 13, 2008
No. CIV S-08-2610 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2610 GGH P.

November 13, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In this case transferred from the Fresno Division, Judge Beck previously granted petitioner in forma pauperis status. Docket # 4. Since petitioner may be entitled to relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's amended habeas petition (Docket # 6) within sixty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the petition. See Rule 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

2. If the response to the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer;

4. If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fifteen days thereafter;

5. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, the consent/reassignment form contemplated by Appendix A(k) to the Local Rules of this court together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and

6. The Clerk of the Court is also directed to modify the court's docket to terminate the People of the State of California as a named respondent to indicate that the only properly named respondent is John Marshall, Warden.


Summaries of

Fernando v. Marshall

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 13, 2008
No. CIV S-08-2610 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Fernando v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:LORETO L. FERNANDO, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 13, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2610 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2008)