holding that Rule 35(b)'s time limit is absolute, regardless of whether the motion for reduction of sentence is framed under Rule 35(b) or 18 U.S.C. § 3651
Summary of this case from U.S. v. MelodyNo. 86-1110.
March 23, 1987.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 799 F. 2d 437.
holding that Rule 35(b)'s time limit is absolute, regardless of whether the motion for reduction of sentence is framed under Rule 35(b) or 18 U.S.C. § 3651
Summary of this case from U.S. v. MelodyFull title:ENTERPRISE TOOLS, INC., ET AL. v. EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 23, 1987
Id., slip op. at 2. The district court looked to United States v. Dunn, 802 F.2d 646, 647-48 (2d Cir. 1986),…
U.S. v. Lots 43 Through 46Subsections § 853(c) and (n)(6)(B) allow a third party bona fide purchaser to retain his interest in the…