upholding conviction for conspiracy and pointing out that extensive (2,000 page) voir dire given.
Summary of this case from United States ex Rel. Means v. SolemNos. 76-793, 76-1081.
May 23, 1977.
C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. Reported below: 181 U. S. App. D. C. 254, 559 F. 2d 31.
upholding conviction for conspiracy and pointing out that extensive (2,000 page) voir dire given.
Summary of this case from United States ex Rel. Means v. Solemupholding constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, making it a crime to `[c]orruptly . . . endeavor to influence, intimidate, or impede any witness. . . .'
Summary of this case from Deehl v. Knoxaffirming trial court's rejection of "content questions" on voir dire related to pre-trial publicity
Summary of this case from Mu'min v. Commonwealthdeclining to review question certified on section 1292(b) appeal on the ground that matter was one of fact
Summary of this case from Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc.submitting § 144 motions to fellow judges for decision is "at most permissive."
Summary of this case from Chitimacha Tribe of La. v. Harry L. Laws Co., Inc.applying pre-1974 statute
Summary of this case from Roberts v. Bailarnoting that federal supervisory standards should apply to review of pretrial publicity issue in addition to constitutional due process standard
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Tokarsdiscussing the tangled skeins of Watergate "[M]ere narratives of past events are not admissible hearsay statements."
Summary of this case from Yaeger v. MurphyFull title:EHRLICHMAN v. UNITED STATES; MITCHELL ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 23, 1977
"Unless a venireman states unambiguously that he would automatically vote against the imposition of capital…
Yount v. PattonPossibly even more prejudicial was the disclosure of petitioner's written confessions and his testimony at…