From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duncan v. Soares

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2008
No. CIV S-05-2613 FCD JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2613 FCD JFM P.

March 6, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's October 31, 2007 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Duncan v. Soares

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2008
No. CIV S-05-2613 FCD JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Duncan v. Soares

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY DUNCAN, Plaintiff, v. ALAN SOARES, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 6, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2613 FCD JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2008)