From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Draper v. Rosario

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 24, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-0032 KJM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-0032 KJM EFB P

07-24-2012

JOHN CLINT DRAPER, Plaintiff, v. D. ROSARIO, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He claims that a current lockdown at his institution is interfering with his ability to comply with the court's discovery and scheduling order, and therefore requests a court order to allow him access to the law library. An exhibit attached to plaintiff's request indicates that inmates are allowed library access if they have "approved court deadlines." Dckt. No. 61, Ex. A. The discovery and scheduling order requires that all written discovery be served not later than August 6, 2012, and that any motions to compel be filed by October 6, 2012. Dckt. No. 56. Plaintiff does not state whether he properly informed the appropriate prison officials of those deadlines. Nor does he otherwise demonstrate that his right of access to the courts is being impaired.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's July 9, 2012 request (Dckt. No. 61) is denied.

______________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Draper v. Rosario

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 24, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-0032 KJM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Draper v. Rosario

Case Details

Full title:JOHN CLINT DRAPER, Plaintiff, v. D. ROSARIO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-0032 KJM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)