concluding that, under the terms of the policy, the United States was clearly an intended third-party beneficiary
Summary of this case from JOU v. DAINo. 807.
January 11, 1971, OCTOBER TERM, 1970.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 426 F. 2d 1027.
concluding that, under the terms of the policy, the United States was clearly an intended third-party beneficiary
Summary of this case from JOU v. DAIFull title:DONALD v. ZACK MEYER'S T. V. SALES SERVICE et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 11, 1971
In order to achieve its goals, Congress chose a "relatively arbitrary rule capable of an easy…
U.S. v. Turtle Mtn. Band of Chippewa IndiansUnited States ex rel. Greenhalgh v. F.D. Rich Co., 520 F.2d 886, 889 (9th Cir. 1975). See also National…