From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. Mechanicsburg Sch. Bd. of Educ.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 15, 2022
3:20cv458 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 15, 2022)

Opinion

3:20cv458

03-15-2022

JANE DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MECHANICSBURG SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants.


Caroline H. Gentry Magistrate Judge

ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 54); (2) DISMISSING DEFENDANT HODGE AS A PARTY TO THIS CASE; AND (3) DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' CAUSE OF ACTION NUMBER 15 AGAINST DEFENDANT LAWHORN

Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge

This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss (1) Defendant Charles Hodge as a Defendant to this action and (2) cause of action number 15 against Defendant Andrew C. Lawhorn (Doc. No. 54). Neither Defendant Hodge nor Defendant Lawhorn have responded to, or opposed, Plaintiffs' motion. In the absence of opposition by Defendants, and for good cause shown, Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss is well taken. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion and DISMISSES Defendant Hodge as a party to this case along with Plaintiffs' cause of action number 15 against Defendant Lawhorn.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Doe v. Mechanicsburg Sch. Bd. of Educ.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 15, 2022
3:20cv458 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Doe v. Mechanicsburg Sch. Bd. of Educ.

Case Details

Full title:JANE DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MECHANICSBURG SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Mar 15, 2022

Citations

3:20cv458 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 15, 2022)