From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 25, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1628 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1628 FCD EFB P.

September 25, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 6, 2006, the court found that plaintiff stated cognizable claims for relief against nine defendants but in the order named defendant Barron twice. Plaintiff requests clarification of that order.

Naming defendant Barron twice was a clerical oversight. No defendant against whom plaintiff has stated a cognizable claim for relief was omitted from the specified defendants.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Davis v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 25, 2006
No. CIV S-05-1628 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2006)
Case details for

Davis v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES T. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 25, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1628 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2006)