From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Warden, Hamilton Cty. Justice Ctr.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 3, 2022
1:21-cv-433 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-433

03-03-2022

DURRELL DAVIS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, HAMILTON CTY. JUSTICE CENTER, Respondent.


Magistrate Judge Stephanie Bowman

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC 6) AND DISMISSING THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

JUDGE MATTHEW W. MCFARLAND

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman (Doc. 6), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's Complaint and CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, an appeal of this Order adopting the Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Warden, Hamilton Cty. Justice Ctr.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 3, 2022
1:21-cv-433 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Davis v. Warden, Hamilton Cty. Justice Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:DURRELL DAVIS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, HAMILTON CTY. JUSTICE CENTER…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Mar 3, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-433 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2022)