expressing doubts, in the context of a constitutional claim brought by relocated children, as to whether a meaningful post-deprivation hearing could be arranged without endangering the children
Summary of this case from Ruffalo by Ruffalo v. CivilettiNo. 80-1325.
April 20, 1981, October TERM, 1980.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 630 F. 2d 277.
expressing doubts, in the context of a constitutional claim brought by relocated children, as to whether a meaningful post-deprivation hearing could be arranged without endangering the children
Summary of this case from Ruffalo by Ruffalo v. CivilettiFull title:DAHL v. AKIN ET UX
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 20, 1981
Defendant Ward contends that he is entitled to summary judgment as plaintiffs have failed to allege that he…
Nagle v. LeeThus it was not necessary for the district court to have disposed of Nagle's claims against ABC to make the…