holding that a party must assert the same reasons in its Rule 50(b) motion as advanced in its Rule 50 motion
Summary of this case from Jimenez v. Chrysler Corp.No. 96-945.
March 17, 1997.
Reported below: 93 F. 3d 1515.
holding that a party must assert the same reasons in its Rule 50(b) motion as advanced in its Rule 50 motion
Summary of this case from Jimenez v. Chrysler Corp.relying on Kimbro when construing the ADA
Summary of this case from Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals Ass'nnoting that the burden rests on both parties to file the necessary materials with the court to support their claims for and against summary judgment
Summary of this case from Valluzzi v. AzarFull title:CROSBY v. HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF VALDOSTA AND LOWNDES COUNTY, DBA SOUTH…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 17, 1997
Id. Given the standard for such motions, the defendant bears a heavy burden in establishing that the evidence…
Zimmermann v. Epstein Becker and Green, P.CSimilarly, the definition of “receivership property” in the order appointing the receiver specifically…