holding prison officials ultimately violated the plaintiff's right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment
Summary of this case from McCurry v. MooreNo. 85-908.
July 7, 1986, October TERM, 1985.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 769 F. 2d 1350.
holding prison officials ultimately violated the plaintiff's right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment
Summary of this case from McCurry v. Mooreholding prison officials ultimately violated the plaintiff's right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment
Summary of this case from McCurry v. Mooreholding that Title VII impermissibly burdens the Free Exercise rights of a church to choose its ministers, that no compelling governmental interest overrides that burden, and that in deciding whether Title VII should be applied to a particular church employee, courts must ascertain whether that employee's position is important to the spiritual and pastoral mission of the church
Summary of this case from Hausch v. Donrey of Nevada, Inc.determining that "deliberate indifference" rather than "actual intent" is the correct standard for assessing Eighth Amendment liability where a prison official's miscalculation of an inmate's release date resulted in five years of additional incarceration and holding that the inmate alleged an Eighth Amendment violation
Summary of this case from Matzell v. Annucciupholding denial of position of pastoral care associate and barring discrimination suit under Free Exercise Clause
Summary of this case from Sabatino v. Saint Aloysius Parishinterpreting Ohio Rule of Evidence 804(B)
Summary of this case from Smith v. Stateapplying Arkansas law
Summary of this case from State v. CollinsFull title:CRANKE ET AL. v. HAYGOOD
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jul 7, 1986
The ministerial exception operates to exempt from the coverage of various employment laws the employment…
Robinson v. Alabama State Dept. of Educ.Therefore, a plaintiff should be entitled to recover not only those fees and expenses incurred as result of…