From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crane v. Buckley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 8, 1905
138 F. 22 (9th Cir. 1905)

Opinion


138 F. 22 (9th Cir. 1905) CRANE v. BUCKLEY et al. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 8, 1905

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

Appeal and Error 1229

Cushing, Grant & Cushing, for plaintiff in error.

Theodore J. Roche, Matthew I. Sullivan, and J. F. Sullivan, for defendants in error.

Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and HAWLEY, District Judge.

HAWLEY, District Judge.

The only point involved in this writ of error is, 'Did the defendant Buckley prosecute his appeal to effect? ' This question was answered in the affirmative by this court in Buckley v. Crane, 123 F. 29, 33, 59 C.C.A. 109. The rulings of the court below in the trial of the present case were in accord with the views heretofore expressed by this court.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Crane v. Buckley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 8, 1905
138 F. 22 (9th Cir. 1905)
Case details for

Crane v. Buckley

Case Details

Full title:CRANE v. BUCKLEY et al.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 8, 1905

Citations

138 F. 22 (9th Cir. 1905)

Citing Cases

William Wrigley, Jr. v. L.P. Larson, Jr.

If one wrongfully mixes his own goods with those of another, so that they cannot be distinguished and…

Modesto Creamery v. Stanislaus Creamery Company

The same rule applies to cases of unfair competition, in which, while there is no violation of an exclusive…