From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cottrell v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2012
No. CIV-S-09-0824 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-09-0824 JAM CKD P

01-31-2012

MICHAEL M. COTTRELL, Plaintiff, v. M. WRIGHT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On November 4, 2011 defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On December 9, 2011 plaintiff was granted an extension of time until January 18, 2012, to file a response. Plaintiff has not done so. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Cottrell v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2012
No. CIV-S-09-0824 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Cottrell v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL M. COTTRELL, Plaintiff, v. M. WRIGHT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

No. CIV-S-09-0824 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012)