From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Leighton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
No. CIV S-11-3353 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-3353 CKD P

01-03-2012

DAVID L. COOK, Plaintiff, v. DORLEEN LEIGHTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has not, however, filed his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the form used by this district. Accordingly, plaintiff's application will be dismissed and plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit the application on the appropriate form. Plaintiff is cautioned that he must also provide a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 6) is dismissed without prejudice;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and

3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

___________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Cook v. Leighton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
No. CIV S-11-3353 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Cook v. Leighton

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. COOK, Plaintiff, v. DORLEEN LEIGHTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-3353 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)