Opinion
2:22-cv-01867-GMN-DJA
11-16-2022
TRISTAN MICHAEL CONTORELLI, Plaintiff, v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a GEICO; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, jointly and severally, Defendants.
RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM, David Menocal, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Ramai Christine Contorelli McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP, Jonathan W. Carlson, Frank A. Toddre, II, Henry H. Kim, Attorneys for Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company d/b/a GEICO
RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM, David Menocal, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Ramai Christine Contorelli
McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP, Jonathan W. Carlson, Frank A. Toddre, II, Henry H. Kim, Attorneys for Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company d/b/a GEICO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFF RAMAI CHRISTINE CONTORELLI ONLY
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties above named, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the above-entitled matter be dismissed with prejudice as it pertains to Plaintiff RAMAI CHRISTINE CONTORELLI only.
Each party will bear their own costs and attorney's fees.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.