From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conley v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jul 15, 2015
Case: 1:15-cv-01155 (D.D.C. Jul. 15, 2015)

Opinion

Case: 1:15-cv-01155

07-15-2015

David R. Conley, Plaintiff, v. United States of America et al., Defendants.


Assigned To : Unassigned
Assign. Date : 7/20/2015
Description: Pro Se Gen. Civil F Deck

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has submitted a Complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application and will dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring dismissal of an action "at any time" the Court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction).

Plaintiff is a North Carolina state prisoner incarcerated in Maury, North Carolina. In a single paragraph, plaintiff alleges that the defendants "in conspiracy failed to liberally construe the plaintiff's pro se section 1983 complaint as a colorable pro-se 2255 petition challenging sentence enhancement by unlawfully assembled criminal statute, N.C.G.S. 14-7.1." Plaintiff names as defendants the United States, the State of North Carolina, the Governor of North Carolina, and Senior U.S. District Judge James C. Fox in Raleigh, North Carolina. The complaint appears to arise from court proceedings in the Eastern District of North Carolina. This Court can neither review the decisions of its sister court nor compel it to act. See United States v. Choi, 818 F. Supp. 2d 79, 85 (D.D.C. 2011) (district courts "generally lack[] appellate jurisdiction over other judicial bodies, and cannot exercise appellate mandamus over other courts.") (citing Lewis v. Green, 629 F. Supp. 546, 553 (D.D.C.1986)); Fleming v. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied 513 U.S. 1150 (1995) ("By filing a complaint in this Court against federal judges who have done nothing more than their duty . . . Fleming has instituted a meritless action.") (applying District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415, 416 (1923)). Hence, this case will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. DATE: July 15, 2015

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Conley v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jul 15, 2015
Case: 1:15-cv-01155 (D.D.C. Jul. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Conley v. United States

Case Details

Full title:David R. Conley, Plaintiff, v. United States of America et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jul 15, 2015

Citations

Case: 1:15-cv-01155 (D.D.C. Jul. 15, 2015)