holding in a case evaluating a layoff resulting from the merger of two corporations that the district court erred by examining the terminations of sales employees from one corporation without examining the terminations of sales employees from the other corporation
Summary of this case from Beale v. GTE California91-1194.
MARCH 23, 1992.
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 945 F. 2d 635.
holding in a case evaluating a layoff resulting from the merger of two corporations that the district court erred by examining the terminations of sales employees from one corporation without examining the terminations of sales employees from the other corporation
Summary of this case from Beale v. GTE Californiaobserving in the context of reviewing agency action that "[c]onflicting expert opinion . . . is not sufficient to allow a reviewing court to conclude the agency decision was arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion"
Summary of this case from Smith v. Office of Civilian Health & Medical Program of the Uniformed ServicesFull title:COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS v. MELLON BANK, N.A., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 23, 1992
Thus, a fundamental feature of leveraged buyouts is that equity is exchanged for debt.Mellon Bank, N.A. v.…
Miami Nat. of Indians of Ind. v. Babbitt, (N.D.Ind. 1996)The Miamis thus seek inclusion in the administrative record of: (1) draft reports, including (a) the draft…