From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claiborne v. Shockley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 21, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2867 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2867 LKK KJM P.

March 21, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 30, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (docket no. 28), are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's "demand for summary judgment" (docket no. 13) is denied;

3. Defendants' motion to dismiss (docket no. 20) is granted; and

4. This case is dismissed for plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit.


Summaries of

Claiborne v. Shockley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 21, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2867 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Claiborne v. Shockley

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS G. CLAIBORNE, Plaintiff, v. T.C. SHOCKLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 21, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2867 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2008)