rejecting argument that Congress intended to limit forfeiture to include only the property titled to defendant at the time of conviction
Summary of this case from U.S. v. MartinezNo. 85-758.
February 24, 1986.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 771 F. 2d 1153.
rejecting argument that Congress intended to limit forfeiture to include only the property titled to defendant at the time of conviction
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Martinezoverruling United States v. Alexander, 741 F.2d 962 (7th Cir. 1984), and United States v. McManigal, 708 F.2d 276 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. granted and judgment vacated, 464 U.S. 979, 104 S.Ct. 419, 78 L.Ed.2d 355
Summary of this case from In re Moffitt, Zwerling Kemler, P.C.Full title:CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA v. SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 24, 1986
(4) whether the 30-minute guarantee was a proximate cause of the collision. In light of the broad…
U.S. v. StaggsWe approve of the approach in Moya-Gomez and Becton: Because the essential issue is whether the appellants…