holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding an expert's opinion that was based on insufficient data regarding the dosage of a harmful substance and the duration of exposure to that substance
Summary of this case from Allen v. Pennsylvania Engineering Corp.No. 91-785.
March 2, 1992, October TERM, 1991.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 939 F. 2d 1106.
holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding an expert's opinion that was based on insufficient data regarding the dosage of a harmful substance and the duration of exposure to that substance
Summary of this case from Allen v. Pennsylvania Engineering Corp.holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding expert's opinion that was based on insufficient data regarding the dosage of a harmful substance and the duration of exposure to that substance
Summary of this case from Edwards v. Safety-Kleen CorporationFull title:CHRISTOPHERSEN, SURVIVING SPOUSE OF CHRISTOPHERSEN, DECEASED, ET AL. v…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 2, 1992
The Fifth Circuit has spoken on this issue. In Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp., 939 F.2d 1106, 1112,…
First United Financial Corp. v. U.S.F. G. Co.And we review the decision of the trial court by the same abuse of discretion standard. Christophersen v.…