Summary
describing the "function of the aggregate" test
Summary of this case from Senza-Gel Corp. v. SeiffhartOpinion
Nos. 71-810, 71-824.
February 28, 1972.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 448 F. 2d 43.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Chicken Delight v. Siegel
U.S.
Feb 28, 1972
405 U.S. 955 (1972)
Summaries of
Chicken Delight v. Siegel
U.S.
Feb 28, 1972
405 U.S. 955 (1972)
describing the "function of the aggregate" test
Summary of this case from Senza-Gel Corp. v. Seiffhartdescribing the "function of the aggregate" test
Summary of this case from Klamath-Lake Pharm. v. Klamath Med. Servstating that "it appears that the company's unilateral action in closing down the plant, which is effectively a refusal to accept the proffer of continued performance on the part of the employees, removes the obligation of working until the [qualifying] date, even if it is viewed as a material part of the contract."
Summary of this case from In re Wapakoneta Machine Co.discussing G.L.c. 34, § 14 and c. 35, § 32
Summary of this case from Thomas O'Connor Co. v. MedfordCase details for
Chicken Delight v. Siegel
Case Details
Full title:CHICKEN DELIGHT, INC., ET AL. v. SIEGEL ET AL.; and SIEGEL ET AL. v…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 28, 1972
Citations
405 U.S. 955 (1972)
Citing Cases
Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.
Chicken Delight, Inc. v. Harris, 412 F.2d 830 (9th Cir. 1969) [hereinafter Siegel I ]. The fantastic growth…
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football LeagueThis offset principle has been applied in a variety of antitrust cases, both in this Circuit and elsewhere.…