From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 27, 2003
539 U.S. 969 (2003)

Summary

setting forth minimal process that is due when the City seizes forfeitable vehicles operated by drivers who are arrested for driving while intoxicated and wishes to maintain possession of the vehicles pending the outcome of the criminal proceedings, establishing what has come to be known as a “Krimstock hearing,” see Ford Motor Credit Co. v. NYC Police Dep't, 503 F.3d 186, 188 (2d Cir.2007)

Summary of this case from Harrell v. City of N.Y.

Opinion

JUNE 27, 2003.


No. 02-10908. SANCHEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 62 Fed. Appx. 921.

No. 02-10911. PIERCEFIELD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 327 F.3d 690.

No. 02-10913. MARCELINO ALVAREZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 67 Fed. Appx. 588.

No. 02-10920. CUAUTLE-TAPIA v. UNITED STATES; and CORTEZ-VILLANUEVA, AKA TORRES-TORRES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 922 (first judgment) and 923 (second judgment).

No. 02-10921. WONG CHANG, AKA GONG LING v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 59 Fed. Appx. 361.

No. 02-10923. DOMINGUEZ-DOMINGUEZ, AKA RIVERA-GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 62 Fed. Appx. 921.

No. 02-355. SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. VEECK, DBA REGIONAL WEB. C.A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 293 F.3d 791.

No. 02-367. AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. v. GEYE ET AL. Sup.Ct. Tex. Motion of Croplife America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 79 S.W.3d 21.

No. 02-649. DEE-K ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. v. HEVEAFIL SDN. BHD. ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Motion of American Antitrust Institute for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 299 F.3d 281.

No. 02-1149. KELLY, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL. v. KRIMSTOCK ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Motion of respondent Valerie Krimstock for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 306 F.3d 40.

No. 02-1411. BOEING CO. v. U.S. EX REL. ROBY. C.A. 6th Cir. Motions of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and National Defense Industrial Association for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 302 F.3d 637.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 27, 2003
539 U.S. 969 (2003)

setting forth minimal process that is due when the City seizes forfeitable vehicles operated by drivers who are arrested for driving while intoxicated and wishes to maintain possession of the vehicles pending the outcome of the criminal proceedings, establishing what has come to be known as a “Krimstock hearing,” see Ford Motor Credit Co. v. NYC Police Dep't, 503 F.3d 186, 188 (2d Cir.2007)

Summary of this case from Harrell v. City of N.Y.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 27, 2003

Citations

539 U.S. 969 (2003)

Citing Cases

Vance v. Franklin

Second, Simms characterizes the seizure of his motor vehicle at the time of his arrest as an illegal seizure…

U.S. v. Velazquez

In fact, the Eighth Circuit often refuses to address such claims if they are raised, directing defendants to…