Ceaser v. Hope Organization

Full title: OSCAR CEASER, Plaintiff, v. HOPE ORGANIZATION, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 2, 2012

CIV S-12-0627 KJM DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)

Opinion

OSCAR CEASER, Plaintiff, v. HOPE ORGANIZATION, et al., Defendants. No. CIV S-12-0627 KJM DAD PS United States District Court, E.D. California. July 2, 2012

          FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

          DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.

         By order signed May 10, 2012, plaintiff's pro se complaint was dismissed and leave was granted to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. Plaintiff was granted thirty days from the date of the order to file an amended complaint and was cautioned that failure to respond to the court's order in a timely manner may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order in any manner.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

         These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Martinez v. Ylst , 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).