From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cates v. International Telephone

U.S.
Jun 13, 1988
486 U.S. 1055 (1988)

Summary

finding that discriminatory intent can be inferred from an action undertaken in response to the majority of the community and their discriminatory intent

Summary of this case from Parents, Alumni, Taylor School v. City of Norfolk

Opinion

No. 87-1724.

June 13, 1988.


C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 828 F. 2d 770.


Summaries of

Cates v. International Telephone

U.S.
Jun 13, 1988
486 U.S. 1055 (1988)

finding that discriminatory intent can be inferred from an action undertaken in response to the majority of the community and their discriminatory intent

Summary of this case from Parents, Alumni, Taylor School v. City of Norfolk

upholding a desegregation plan that included a magnet school program requiring minority enrollment to be within 10% of the system-wide proportion of minority students

Summary of this case from Stanley v. Darlington County School District

affirming mandatory techniques imposed by the district court at United States v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ., 635 F. Supp. 1538 (S.D.N Y 1986)

Summary of this case from Coalition to Save Children v. Bd. of Educ.

recognizing that the question of intent in an equal protection case belongs to the trier of fact

Summary of this case from Kirschner v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, V.
Case details for

Cates v. International Telephone

Case Details

Full title:CATES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CATES v…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 13, 1988

Citations

486 U.S. 1055 (1988)
108 S. Ct. 2822

Citing Cases

Spallone v. United States

Instead, it secured an agreement from the city to appoint an outside housing adviser to identify sites for…

People Who Care v. Rockford Bd. of Educ.

The basic principle governing this case is that governmental authorities may not intentionally segregate or…