From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. Ressing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2253 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2253 KJM KJN P

01-17-2012

LUIS CASTRO, Plaintiff, v. BROCK RESSING, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 9, 2012 motion for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 17) is denied.

____________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Castro v. Ressing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2253 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Castro v. Ressing

Case Details

Full title:LUIS CASTRO, Plaintiff, v. BROCK RESSING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2253 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)