From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Boyd Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION at ASHLAND
Sep 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-62-HRW (E.D. Ky. Sep. 20, 2012)

Summary

In Campbell Co. v. Boyd County, 117 Neb. 186, 220 N.W. 240, this court, in construing and applying such sections, together with what is now section 27-1305, R.R.S. 1943, concluded that the allowance or disallowance of a claim by the county board was the exercise of a quasi-judicial power, and that an appeal therefrom brought the action to the district court for trial de novo as "though the action had been originally instituted in such court."

Summary of this case from Roy v. Bladen School Dist. No. R-31

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-62-HRW

09-20-2012

MICHAEL CAMPBELL, PLAINTIFF, v. BOYD COUNTY, KENTUCKY, et al., DEFENDANTS.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No, 93].

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the undersigned referred the motion to Magistrate Judge CANDACE J. Smith for a report and recommendation [Docket No. 104].

On August 15, 2012, the Magistrate issued her report and recommendation that the motion be sustained [Docket No. 124]. Specifically, concluded that Plaintiff's medical negligence claims are time barred.

Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 125]. The Court having reviewed the objections, as well as the record, finds nothing therein which would contradict or call into question the findings of the Magistrate. The Objections are, essentially, a reiteration of the arguments set forth in Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion. Those arguments were considered and rejected by the Magistrate Judge and Plaintiff offers no additional argument which would persuade this Court to differ with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

Thus, the Court shall adopt the report and recommendation as and for its own opinion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation [Docket No. 124] is hereby, APPROVED and ADOPTED as for the opinion of the Court and, that in conformity therewith, the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 93] is hereby SUSTAINED. A judgment in favor of the Defendants will be entered contemporaneously herewith.

_____________

Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr., Senior Judge


Summaries of

Campbell v. Boyd Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION at ASHLAND
Sep 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-62-HRW (E.D. Ky. Sep. 20, 2012)

In Campbell Co. v. Boyd County, 117 Neb. 186, 220 N.W. 240, this court, in construing and applying such sections, together with what is now section 27-1305, R.R.S. 1943, concluded that the allowance or disallowance of a claim by the county board was the exercise of a quasi-judicial power, and that an appeal therefrom brought the action to the district court for trial de novo as "though the action had been originally instituted in such court."

Summary of this case from Roy v. Bladen School Dist. No. R-31
Case details for

Campbell v. Boyd Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CAMPBELL, PLAINTIFF, v. BOYD COUNTY, KENTUCKY, et al., DEFENDANTS.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION at ASHLAND

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-62-HRW (E.D. Ky. Sep. 20, 2012)

Citing Cases

Roy v. Bladen School Dist. No. R-31

Such manner of appeal is provided by sections 23-135 to 23-137, R.R.S. 1943. In Campbell Co. v. Boyd County,…