From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cameron v. Siddiq

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Sep 18, 2007
Case No. 2:07-cv-684-WKW [WO] (M.D. Ala. Sep. 18, 2007)

Summary

holding that petitioner's mere conclusions of law and unsupported factual allegations were not sufficient to justify preliminary restraining order

Summary of this case from Guthrie v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg. Na

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-684-WKW [WO].

September 18, 2007


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 15) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 15) is ADOPTED;

2. The plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 13) is DENIED; and

3. This case is REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings.


Summaries of

Cameron v. Siddiq

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Sep 18, 2007
Case No. 2:07-cv-684-WKW [WO] (M.D. Ala. Sep. 18, 2007)

holding that petitioner's mere conclusions of law and unsupported factual allegations were not sufficient to justify preliminary restraining order

Summary of this case from Guthrie v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg. Na
Case details for

Cameron v. Siddiq

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY FRANK CAMERON, #105591, Plaintiff, v. TAHIR SIDDIQ, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Sep 18, 2007

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-684-WKW [WO] (M.D. Ala. Sep. 18, 2007)

Citing Cases

Guthrie v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg. Na

egal theory to exclude Wells Fargo from the property or to prevent them from filing any actions in state…