From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Britt v. Thomas

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 6, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv483-MEF (M.D. Ala. Aug. 6, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv483-MEF

08-06-2014

RAYMOND TANELL BRITT, #280682, Plaintiff, v. KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND OPINION

On July 10, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 4). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Britt's failure to file the requisite fees or provide the court with financial information in compliance with the order of this court.

Done this the 6th day of August, 2014.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Britt v. Thomas

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 6, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv483-MEF (M.D. Ala. Aug. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Britt v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND TANELL BRITT, #280682, Plaintiff, v. KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al.…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 6, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv483-MEF (M.D. Ala. Aug. 6, 2014)