From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boutte v. Clay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jan 23, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-1377 (W.D. La. Jan. 23, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-1377

01-23-2018

MELVIN BRADLEY BOUTTE v. BECKY CLAY, ET AL.


UNASSIGNED DISTRICT JUDGE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 19] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, determining that the findings are correct under applicable law, an noting the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the claims against Defendants Lt. Deville, C/O Bennett, Counselor Odom, Teddy Desholel, and K. Clostner are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 23rd day of January, 2018.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Boutte v. Clay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jan 23, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-1377 (W.D. La. Jan. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Boutte v. Clay

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN BRADLEY BOUTTE v. BECKY CLAY, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-1377 (W.D. La. Jan. 23, 2018)