Opinion
No. 09-3536.
Filed August 13, 2010.
ORDER
The court having received two petitions for rehearing en banc, which were circulated to all active judges of this court, none of whom requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the petitions for rehearing have been referred to the original panel.
The panel has further reviewed the petitions for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petitions were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petitions are denied. Judge Bell would grant rehearing for the reasons stated in his dissent.