From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackwell v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 6, 2012
3:11-cv-00684-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00684-LRH-VPC

12-06-2012

MELANIE R. BLACKWELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#18) entered on September 14, 2012, recommending denying Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (#12) filed on March 26, 2012, and granting Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#14) filed on April 25, 2012. Plaintiff filed her Objections to Magistrate Judge's Finding and Recommendation (#21) on October 22, 2012, and Defendant filed his Opposition to Plaintiff's Response to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (#22) on November 5, 2012. This action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the response of Defendant, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions. With regard to the specific objection concerning the rejection of Dr. O'Connell's opinion, the Court agrees that the Administrative Law Judge's reliance upon other evidence and the Magistrate Judges's explanation of it supports the rejection. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#18) entered on September 14, 2012 should be adopted and accepted. Good cause appearing,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#18) entered on September 14, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (#12) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#14) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Blackwell v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 6, 2012
3:11-cv-00684-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Blackwell v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MELANIE R. BLACKWELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 6, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00684-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2012)