From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bevis v. Armco Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 15, 1950
153 Ohio St. 366 (Ohio 1950)

Opinion

No. 32035

Decided February 15, 1950.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Workmen's compensation — Employee's action for damages against complying employer — For fraud in concealing from employee his silicosis — Inducing remaining on job thereby aggravating silicosis — Demurrer to petition sustained — Workmen's Compensation Act and Constitution precluded such action — Section 1465-70, General Code — Section 35, Article II, Constitution — Abridgment of privileges — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Involuntary servitude — Section 6 Article 1, Constitution — Section 1, Article XIII, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Supremacy of federal law — Article VI, U.S. Constitution — Right to safety — Section 1, Article 1, Constitution — Due process — Section 16, Article 1, Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler county.

Mr. Robert E. Brooks, Mr. Louis C. Capelle and Mr. Robert L. Young, for appellant.

Messrs. Frost Jacobs, Mr. Harold L. Siebenthaler, Mr. Henry Wise Hobson, Jr., and Mr. G.W.A. Wilmer, for appellee.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TURNER and TAFT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bevis v. Armco Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 15, 1950
153 Ohio St. 366 (Ohio 1950)
Case details for

Bevis v. Armco Steel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BEVIS, APPELLANT v. ARMCO STEEL CORP., APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 15, 1950

Citations

153 Ohio St. 366 (Ohio 1950)
91 N.E.2d 479

Citing Cases

Yocum v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Cases involving a factual situation comparable to that presented in the case now before us have been decided…

Mercer v. Uniroyal

R. C. 4123.74 has been applied liberally in granting immunity to complying employers. As stated in the first…