holding that a substantive due process claim for pretextual deprivation of employment is precluded by McKinney
Summary of this case from Wallace v. City of MontgomeryNo. 94-913.
January 17, 1995.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 25 F. 3d 1342.
holding that a substantive due process claim for pretextual deprivation of employment is precluded by McKinney
Summary of this case from Wallace v. City of Montgomeryconcluding that property of corporation controlled by debtor considered to be property of debtor for purposes of section 727
Summary of this case from Aspire Fed. Credit Union v. Robinson (In re Robinson)overturning jury verdict against City in § 1983 case arising from fatal shooting and directing entry of judgment in favor of City
Summary of this case from Watts v. City of Hartfordapplying the rationale of Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 291, 111 S. Ct. 654, 112 L. Ed. 2d 755 to § 727 actions
Summary of this case from Premier Capital, LLC v. Wyman (In re Wyman)applying the rationale of Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 291, 111 S.Ct. 654, 112 L.Ed.2d 755 to § 727 actions
Summary of this case from Premier Capital, LLC v. Wyman (In re Wyman)applying the rationale in Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 291, 111 S.Ct. 654, 112 L.Ed.2d 755
Summary of this case from Lassman v. Mahfouz (In re Mahfouz)Full title:BERRY, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BERRY, DECEASED v. CITY OF…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 17, 1995
See Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 75, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 1092, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985). Similarly, the procedural…
In re BurnsideExceptions to discharge under § 727 require proof by a preponderance of the evidence. In re Adams, 31 F.3d…