From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berry v. City of Detroit

U.S.
Jan 17, 1995
513 U.S. 1111 (1995)

Summary

holding that a substantive due process claim for pretextual deprivation of employment is precluded by McKinney

Summary of this case from Wallace v. City of Montgomery

Opinion

No. 94-913.

January 17, 1995.


ORDER

C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 25 F. 3d 1342.


Summaries of

Berry v. City of Detroit

U.S.
Jan 17, 1995
513 U.S. 1111 (1995)

holding that a substantive due process claim for pretextual deprivation of employment is precluded by McKinney

Summary of this case from Wallace v. City of Montgomery

concluding that property of corporation controlled by debtor considered to be property of debtor for purposes of section 727

Summary of this case from Aspire Fed. Credit Union v. Robinson (In re Robinson)

overturning jury verdict against City in § 1983 case arising from fatal shooting and directing entry of judgment in favor of City

Summary of this case from Watts v. City of Hartford

applying the rationale of Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 291, 111 S. Ct. 654, 112 L. Ed. 2d 755 to § 727 actions

Summary of this case from Premier Capital, LLC v. Wyman (In re Wyman)

applying the rationale of Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 291, 111 S.Ct. 654, 112 L.Ed.2d 755 to § 727 actions

Summary of this case from Premier Capital, LLC v. Wyman (In re Wyman)

applying the rationale in Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 291, 111 S.Ct. 654, 112 L.Ed.2d 755

Summary of this case from Lassman v. Mahfouz (In re Mahfouz)
Case details for

Berry v. City of Detroit

Case Details

Full title:BERRY, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BERRY, DECEASED v. CITY OF…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 17, 1995

Citations

513 U.S. 1111 (1995)

Citing Cases

Olesen v. Class

See Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 75, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 1092, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985). Similarly, the procedural…

In re Burnside

Exceptions to discharge under § 727 require proof by a preponderance of the evidence. In re Adams, 31 F.3d…