From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bernstein v. Shifman

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 25, 1960
101 N.W.2d 331 (Mich. 1960)

Opinion

Docket No. 17, Calendar No. 48,273.

Decided February 25, 1960.

Appeal from Wayne; Targonski (Victor), J. Submitted January 6, 1960. (Docket No. 17, Calendar No. 48,273.) Decided February 25, 1960.

Action by Eugenia May Bernstein against Mendel Shifman for damages arising out of breach of covenant to make improvements on leased property. Verdict for plaintiff and judgment entered thereon without interest. Plaintiff's motion to enter judgment to include interest denied. Plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Sander Bernstein, for plaintiff.


Refer to Bernstein v. Shifman, 355 Mich. 398. Subsequent trial to a jury resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff lessor in the sum of $10,000, that being the amount required by the lease to make good the defendant lessee's covenant for improvements. Plaintiff moved for entry of judgment on the verdict with specification of right to recover interest at the legal rate, on the amount of the verdict, from August 1, 1956, that being the date of breach as previously determined by this Court. The trial judge denied such motion. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff is entitled to recover interest as claimed, in addition to the principal amount due her ( Gottesman v. Fay-Bea Construction Co., 355 Mich. 6). Her motion should have been granted.

I would reverse and remand for entry of judgment in accordance with these views. Plaintiff should have costs.

DETHMERS, C.J., and CARR, KELLY, SMITH, EDWARDS, KAVANAGH, and SOURIS, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Bernstein v. Shifman

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 25, 1960
101 N.W.2d 331 (Mich. 1960)
Case details for

Bernstein v. Shifman

Case Details

Full title:BERNSTEIN v. SHIFMAN

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Feb 25, 1960

Citations

101 N.W.2d 331 (Mich. 1960)
101 N.W.2d 331

Citing Cases

Fitzpatrick v. Ritzenhein

Should the trial court have added interest to the jury's verdict for cross-plaintiff William S. Ritzenhein?…

Feiler v. Midway Sales, Inc.

No interest was allowed plaintiffs on the judgment although performance of the promise was due in May of…